|
USS Salem Specifications
|
Other Ships Named Salem |
USS Salem Photo Gallery
|
Pursuit of the Graf Spee
|
| Historical Documents
Found Aboard the USS Salem |
The Historical
Significance of USS Salem to Naval Warship
Design and Construction (Shipbuilding)

The Historical
Significance of the USS Salem in Relation to the
Cold War
By
Doctor John Scholes
Although the USS Salem never fired her guns in
action and was completed too late to see service
in World War II, she did participate in a
significant way in a war and contributed to
winning that war - the Cold War. As flagship of
the US Navy's Sixth Fleet in the Mediterranean,
the USS Salem played a major (though perhaps
under appreciated) role in the early years of
the Cold War, in what was at that time
considered the most important theater of the
Cold War (by both the western powers (NATO) and
the eastern block). The importance that the
Soviet Union assigned to the USS Salem (and her
sisters) is perhaps best illustrated by the
lengths that the Soviet Navy went to in an
attempt to counter the US Navy's "super
cruisers". The lack of success in this attempt
was source of considerable frustration to the
Soviet Navy and Soviet Union (especially in the
Mediterranean).
Unlike the United States
and its western allies, the Soviet Union did not
demobilize following World War II. Rather, the
Soviet Union (and its dictator, Joseph Stalin)
not only worked to consolidate their hold on
eastern Europe, but worked actively to extend
Communist (and, therefore, the Soviet Union's)
influence throughout the world. The
Mediterranean was the theater where much of the
Soviet Union's efforts to extend their influence
was focused in the early years of the Cold War.
In order to extend their influence beyond their
borders (and those of their newly conquered
eastern European empire), the Soviet Union (and
its leaders, especially Stalin) recognized the
need for a powerful ocean going Navy. The need
for a powerful fleet in order to have worldwide
influence had been recognized by Stalin prior to
WW II, but the Soviet Union's and its navy's
plans had been frustrated by many factors,
including the lack of professional design staff,
lack of specialized industrial and technical
infrastructure, and lack of foreign assistance,
and finally cancelled by the Axis invasion of
the Soviet Union and the immediate pressing
requirements of WW II. Following the end of WW
II and the beginning of the Cold War, the Soviet
Union's pre war plans for a large ocean going
navy were revived.
As absolute ruler of the
Soviet Union, Stalin had immense influence on
the Soviet Navy's plans, even to the point of
all major ship designs having to meet with
Stalin's personal approval. While the Soviet
Navy's plans were modified and updated to
reflect (to at least some degree) World War II
experience, Stalin had (and continued to have) a
strong preference for large gun armed surface
ships, particularly cruisers (and, to a slightly
lesser degree, battleships). A large effort to
design and construct such ships was begun by the
Soviet Union following WW II. Aircraft carriers
were much less highly regarded by Stalin
(despite WW II experience) and, therefore, the
Soviet Navy's program gave them much lower
priority. As the design and construction of such
ships required an enormous industrial and
technical infrastructure (much of which had to
be created from scratch in the Soviet Union) and
because of the damage inflicted on the Soviet
Union in WW II, a long period would be required
to actually build such ships (despite Stalin's
efforts to do so). For this reason (and others)
most of the ships of Stalin's planned ocean
going fleet would never be completed (or, in
many cases, even begun).
One product of Stalin's
post war planned fleet that was completed
(although not in the numbers originally planned)
was the Sverdlov class of light (6" gun)
cruisers. As these cruisers were modifications
and updates of the pre-WWII Chapev class of
light cruisers, they could be built much more
quickly than the completely new designs for
larger more advanced cruisers and other ships.
The Soviet Navy (and Stalin) were not, however,
fully satisfied with the Sverdlov class.
Although these ships were relatively large and
powerful for light cruisers and compared fairly
well with pre-WW II designed light cruisers
(such as British light cruisers and the US
Navy's Cleveland class), they were considered by
the Soviet Navy (and Stalin) as inferior to the
US Navy's heavy (8"gun) cruisers, and especially
inferior to the USS Salem and her sisters. This
was of particular concern to the Soviet Navy, as
it felt that its land based air power could
counter the US Navy's aircraft carrier based air
power (especially in areas such as the
Mediterranean), which would leave (in its view)
large surface ships as the most important
factors in naval power (Soviet submarines were
not permitted by Turkey to pass from the Black
Sea to the Mediterranean at that time) . Stalin
(and much of the Soviet Navy) also felt that
large surface warships were the most valuable
naval asset in demonstrating the Soviet Union's
superior power and technology (extremely
important factors in gaining influence in the
Cold War). Obviously, the Sverdlov class
cruisers were unsatisfactory in this role in
comparison to the USS Salem and her sisters
(and, to a somewhat lesser extent, the slightly
older, slow fire 8" gun US Navy heavy cruisers).
So the Soviet Navy (and Stalin) looked for an
"answer" to the USS Salem and her sisters (as
well as the other US Navy heavy cruisers).
While the Soviet Navy had a
design for (and had begun the early stages of
construction of) very large (battle) cruisers of
the Stalingrad class (40,000 tons; 12" guns),
these ships were not considered suitable
counters to the USS Salem and the other US Navy
8" gun cruisers. They were considered too large,
too expensive, and too few in numbers, and
Stalin had different plans for their employment.
So a cruiser design to specifically counter and
surpass the USS Salem and her sisters and the
other US Navy heavy cruisers was begun - known
as Project 66 (the subject of an excellent
article by Stephen McLaughlin in Warship
International, vol no 45, issue no 3, entitled
"Admiral Kuznetsov's Cruiser Killer: The Project
66 Design" - from which much of the information
below was derived).
The Soviet Union had
considered designs for "super cruisers" prior to
and during WW II and had also considered designs
for very large cruisers mounting 220 mm (8.86")
guns in 1947-48 (before deciding on 12" guns for
the Stalingrad class), but serious design work
on Project 66 began in 1951. The design was
specifically intended to counter the US Navy's
heavy (8" gun) cruisers (especially the USS
Salem and her sisters) and was supported both by
Stalin and the Soviet Navy's Commissar, Admiral
Kuznetsov. A special 220 mm (8.86") gun was also
designed to be superior to the US Navy's 8" guns
(a prototype was built and tested in 1954). By
the end of 1953, a fairly detailed "final"
design was completed. The ship planned had a
standard displacement of over 26,000 tons
standard (approximately 50% larger than the USS
Salem at approximately 17,000 tons) and mounted
9 of the 220 mm (8.86") guns, as well as 8 130
mm (5.1") guns and smaller AA guns. Despite the
much larger size of the Project 66 design, armor
protection was remarkably similar to the USS
Salem, and theoretical top speed was only
minimally greater.
Even after Stalin's death
in 1953 (and the end of many of the other large
ship designs that he supported), the Project 66
design continued, as it was supported by Admiral
Kuznetsov and other members of the Soviet naval
staff. Not all members of the Soviet naval staff
agreed, however, so the design was tested the
Voroshilov Naval Academy (equivalent to the US
Navy's Naval War College) in early 1954. The
Project 66 design was specifically tested
against the USS Salem and the USS Des Moines
class. The results of the test concluded that
despite the much greater theoretical maximum
range (almost 52,000 versus 30,000 yds) and
heavier shell (388 versus 335 lbs) of the very
powerful 220 mm (8.86") gun of the Project 66
design, the Des Moines class would be superior
to the Project 66 design in a real world fight.
Soviet radar technology did not permit any
chance of useful fire control beyond 40,000 yds
and between 40,000 and 30,000 yds the
probability of hitting with the Project 66
design and gun and Soviet fire control was so
low that not enough hits could be made to be
effective (baring a "fluke" hit), even if the
entire capacity of the magazines were utilized.
As soon as the range closed to 30,000 yds or
less (as in a real world engagement), the USS
Salem and her sisters would have a major
advantage in rate of fire (10 versus 3-5 rounds
per minute per gun), magazine capacity (150
versus 100-120 rounds per gun), fire control
(superior to all other navies) and accuracy (the
Soviets may have seen examples of the USS Salem
and her sisters' incredible accuracy in their
practice firings) and superior damage control
and at least equality in armor protection. The
Project 66 design, despite its large size and
great cost, could not even equal, much less
surpass, the USS Salem and her sisters in real
world battle. The Project 66 design was
abandoned and the Soviet Navy (and Admiral
Kuznetsov and the Soviet Naval Staff) gave up in
frustration. The Soviet Navy never gained
superiority over (or even parity with) the US
Navy in the Mediterranean (or elsewhere) and the
Soviet Union never gained the influence and
dominance over the Mediterranean that it sought
and, at one time, thought it could achieve. The
USS Salem and her sisters played a significant
role in achieving the US Navy's Cold War
victory.
Not only the Soviet Navy,
but also the US Navy regarded the USS Salem and
her sisters as particularly important to its
Cold War mission. During the Korean War, the USS
Salem and her sisters were kept in the
Mediterranean as the most important theater of
the Cold War, as the US Navy feared that the
Korean War might be a diversion to draw strength
away from the most important area. This was
somewhat unfortunate, as the USS Salem had (at
the beginning of the Korean War) the only
installation of a new specialized shore
bombardment computer (several of these computers
were later removed from the USS Salem and her
sisters and placed on the Iowa class battleships
during their 1980s reactivation) and the 8" 55
RF guns would have been highly effective in the
Korean War. The US Navy, however, wanted its
best ships in the most important place, which it
felt was the Mediterranean.
After the USS Salem and her
sister ship the USS Des Moines were
decommissioned and placed in "mothballs", they
continued to be valued. They were kept at the
highest level of readiness and maintenance in
the Reserve Fleet. During the Vietnam War,
reactivation of both ships was seriously
considered (either as a supplement to or
alternative to the USS New Jersey). Opposition
by high ranking Naval Aviators and many
politicians ultimately contributed to the lack
of reactivation (as well as a likely shortage of
the special cartridge cases for the 8" 55 RF
guns). The USS Newport News remained in service
(ultimately as the last "big gun" cruiser) and
demonstrated her capability and that of the 8"
55 RF guns in Vietnam (as well as the quantities
of the special cartridge cases that were
required). While all the other remaining big gun
cruisers were scrapped during or shortly after
the Vietnam War, the USS Salem and her sisters
were retained in reserve. When the reactivation
and modernization of the Iowa class battleships
was being considered (and ultimately
accomplished) in the 1980s, a similar
reactivation and modernization (with missile
armament, etc) was proposed for the USS Salem
and USS Des Moines. The Iowas were chosen
instead, partly due to their larger size and
greater capacity to carry the weight and volume
of the new systems.
It was not until the fall
of the Soviet Union and the end of the Cold War
and the completion of Dessert Storm and the
liberation of Kuwait that the USS Salem and the
USS Des Moines were removed from the Navy List
and the Reserve Fleet. The USS Newport News was
removed from the Navy List in 1978, but was
retaining in the Reserve Fleet (for spares for
her sisters). The retention of the USS Salem and
her sisters far longer than any other big gun
cruisers is a testament to the regard that the
US Navy (at least many in the Navy) had for the
value of these ships, especially in the Cold
War. Therefore, as the only surviving ship of
her class, the USS Salem represents a fitting
memorial to those who served in the Cold War,
and especially to the sailors and their ships.
In a larger sense, the USS Salem also represents
a testament to a period in history when United
States industry and technology was supreme in
the world. No other navy or nation could have
built the USS Salem and her sisters. That is
only one of many reasons she deserves to be
preserved.
|